TYPOLOGY OF ACTIVITIES TO DEVELOP WRITING SKILLS OF ESP STUDENTS THROUGH AUTHENTICITY IN TBLT
Keywords:
Keywords: English for Specific Purposes (ESP), Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), Authenticity, Writing Skills, Typology of Activities, Higher Education.Abstract
Abstract: This article addresses the integration of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and authentic materials as a structural framework for developing the professional writing skills of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students. Writing proficiency within specialized university curricula remains a critical determinant of career success, yet traditional, form-focused models often fail to capture the pragmatics of target professional environments. To bridge this gap, this paper establishes a systematic typology of writing tasks designed around authentic texts, digital environments, and professional situational interactions. Using a mixed-methods research design with a cohort of 68 undergraduate engineering and management students, the study evaluates the instructional efficacy of three primary activity categories: simulated procedural reporting, collaborative technical documentation, and professional communicative correspondence. The empirical data indicate a statistically significant enhancement in grammatical accuracy, structural coherence, and genre authenticity among the experimental group. The findings confirm that combining real-world contextual text inputs with structural task cycles actively scaffolds the lexical acquisition and pragmatic competence necessary for global professional settings.
References
Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 385–395. Page 386.
Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman. Pages 28–32, 101–105.
East, M. (2021). Foundational Principles of Task-Based Language Teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039709. Pages 12–18.
Cited by: 221
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. Pages 1–10, 16–24.
Cited by: 7644
Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347–353. Pages 348–350.
Córdoba Cubillo, P., & Navas Brenes, C. A. (2011). Using task-based instruction in an ESP course in the Computer Center at the University of Costa Rica. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 9(1), 1–22. Pages 4–9.
Cited by: 33
Long, M. H. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell. Pages 6–15.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press. Pages 16–21.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press. Pages 121–125.
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press. Pages 95–104.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press. Pages 61–68.
Whyte, S. (2013). Teaching ESP: A task-based framework for French graduate courses. ASp. Revue du GERAS, (63), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.3280. Pages 7–12.
Cited by: 32






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo