EFFECTIVE MECHANISMS FOR DEVELOPING THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF DEPUTY DIRECTORS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF UZBEKISTAN
Keywords:
deputy director, professional competence, academic affairs, continuous professional development, instructional leadership, school management, Uzbekistan.Abstract
The quality of general secondary education increasingly depends not only on teachers’ instructional performance but also on the professional competence of school leaders who coordinate, monitor, and improve the teaching-learning process. In this regard, deputy directors for academic affairs occupy a strategically important position, as they connect national education policy, school-level management, teacher professional development, curriculum implementation, lesson observation, assessment, and data-based decision-making. This article examines effective mechanisms for developing the professional competence of deputy directors in secondary schools. The study is based on a qualitative conceptual analysis of international research on school leadership, continuous professional development, instructional leadership, and competence-based management, with particular attention to the reform context of Uzbekistan. The findings show that the professional growth of deputy directors becomes effective when it is organized as a systematic and continuous process rather than as occasional training. The article proposes a model consisting of diagnostic needs assessment, individual professional development planning, modular training, mentoring and coaching, school-based practice, professional learning communities, digital monitoring, reflective portfolios, and performance-based feedback. These mechanisms can strengthen managerial, pedagogical, analytical, communicative, digital, and reflective competencies of deputy directors. The article concludes that developing deputy directors’ professional competence is a key condition for improving school governance, supporting teachers, and ensuring sustainable educational quality.
References
Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Approval of the National Program for the Development of School Education in 2022-2026”, No. PF-134, adopted on May 11, 2022. Tashkent.
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Education”, No. O‘RQ-637, September 23, 2020.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2016). Successful School Leadership. Education Development Trust.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Fullan, M. (2014). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results, Volume I: Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results, Volume II: Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-Centered Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
UNESCO. (2024). Global Education Monitoring Report 2024/5: Leadership in Education—Lead for Learning. Paris: UNESCO.
Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (pp. 45–65). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo