THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES OF INTENSITY AND GRADATION: A SEMANTIC, COGNITIVE, AND FUNCTIONAL-PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS

A’zamjon Ixtiyorov

Authors

A’zamjon Ixtiyorov Kokand State University, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

intensity, gradation, gradability, intensification, degree semantics, semantic scale, functional-semantic field, evaluative semantics, expressiveness, emotionality, cognitive linguistics, pragmatics, intensifiers, English language, Uzbek language.

Abstract

This article analyzes the linguistic nature, semantic essence, and interrelationship of the categories of intensity and gradation. It provides a scientific justification for the role of gradation as a general category expressing the semantics of degree and for intensity as a semantic-pragmatic phenomenon reflecting the higher segments of this system. Drawing on the theoretical perspectives of J. Lyons, D. Bolinger, C. Kennedy, G. Lakoff, R. Langacker, A. V. Bondarko, and other scholars, the study examines the cognitive, functional-semantic, and pragmatic characteristics of intensity and gradation. Furthermore, the article explores the connection of these categories with evaluation, expressiveness, and emotionality. A comparative analysis based on English and Uzbek linguistic data reveals both the universal and national-cultural aspects of intensity and gradation. The findings demonstrate that intensity is a category grounded in gradation, yet semantically and pragmatically more complex.

References

Arutyunova, N. D. (1988). Tipy yazykovyx znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt. Moskva: Nauka.

Bolinger, D. (1972). Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.

Bondarko, A. V. (1984). O grammatike funksional'no-semanticheskix poley. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 43(5), 492–498.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kennedy, C. (2007). Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1–45.

Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2005). Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates. Language, 81(2), 345–381.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paradis, C. (2008). Configurations, Construals and Change: Expressions of Degree. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Safarov, Sh. (2006). Kognitiv tilshunoslik. Toshkent: Sangzor.

Mahmudov, N. M. (2017). Til va nutq. Toshkent: Mumtoz so‘z.

Nurmonov, A. (2012). Tanlangan asarlar (3 jildlik). Toshkent: Akademnashr.

Sayfullayeva, R., Mengliyev, B., Boqiyeva, G., Qurbonova, M., Yunusova, Z., & Abuzalova, M. (2009). Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya.

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.