LEGAL REGULATION OF DIGITAL CONTENT AND INTERNET COPYRIGHT: UZBEKISTAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
Keywords:
digital content, internet copyright, Uzbekistan, comparative law, online piracy, safe harbour, platform liability, AI-generated works.Abstract
The regulation of digital content and online copyright poses a layered challenge: substantive rights must be recalibrated for borderless distribution, intermediaries must be allocated calibrated duties, and enforcement must keep pace with technological change without curtailing legitimate expression. This article examines Uzbekistan’s evolving framework for digital content and copyright and situates it against four comparator regimes: the United States, the European Union, China, and the Russian Federation. It traces Uzbekistan’s alignment with international norms — accession to the Berne Convention in 2004 and to the WIPO Internet Treaties in 2019, followed by the 2021 statutory amendments — and assesses the gap between formal protection and effective enforcement. The comparative analysis identifies four distinct regulatory philosophies: the U.S. safe-harbour model under the DMCA, the EU shift toward platform accountability through the Digital Single Market Directive, China’s administrative-led enforcement, and Russia’s site-blocking regime. The article argues that Uzbekistan should pursue a calibrated middle path that combines a dedicated copyright notice-and-takedown procedure, due-process safeguards against overreach, statutory recognition of flexible user exceptions, and active support for legitimate digital markets.
References
Al-Busaidi, A. S., Raman, R., Hughes, L., Albashrawi, M. A., Malik, T., Dwivedi, Y. K., … & Walton, P. (2024). Redefining boundaries in innovation and knowledge domains: Investigating the impact of generative artificial intelligence on copyright and intellectual property rights. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100630.
Bukhari, S. W. R., Hassan, S. U., & Aleem, Y. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on copyright law: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Law & Social Studies, 5(4), 647–656.
Ferri, F. (2021). The dark side(s) of the EU Directive on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. China-EU Law Journal, 7(1–4), 21–38.
Han, D. (2016). From vagueness to clarity? Articulating legal criteria of digital content regulation in China. Global Media and Communication, 12(3), 211–227.
He, X., & Shan, P. (2024). China’s regulations on the attribution of AI-generated content: An exploration based on the open-ended approach. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice.
Ilyasov, K. (2024). Practical reforms in the field of copyright protection in the Republic of Uzbekistan and their promising results. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2), 6.
Kaye, D. B. V., & Gray, J. E. (2021). Copyright gossip: Exploring copyright opinions, theories, and strategies on YouTube. Social Media + Society, 7(3).
Khasimova, L. N., & Gumerova, E. F. (2020). Digital rights in Russia: Legal regulation and development prospects. Proceedings of the MTDE 2020 Conference.
Marsoof, A. (2015). "Notice and takedown": A copyright perspective. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 5(2), 183–205.
Moyakine, E., & Tabachnik, A. (2021). Struggling to strike the right balance between interests at stake. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105512.
Muravyeva, M., & Gurkov, A. (2021). Law and digitization in Russia. In The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies (pp. 77–93). Springer.
Oprysk, L. (2021). Digital consumer contract law without prejudice to copyright. GRUR International, 70(10), 943–956.
Schlag, G. (2023). European Union’s regulating of social media: A discourse analysis of the Digital Services Act. Politics and Governance, 11(3).
Urinboyev, R. (2023). Islamic legal culture in Uzbekistan. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 55(3), 402–429.
Xu, J., & Yu, H. (2022). Regulating and governing China’s internet and digital media in the Xi Jinping era. Media International Australia, 185(1), 3–8.
Zou, L., & Chen, D. (2024). Using blockchain evidence in China’s digital copyright legislation to enhance the sustainability of legal systems. Systems, 12(9), 356.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo