PARADIGM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN ASIA: CONFUCIANISM AND MODERNIZATION

Zarina Xojiqulova Faxriddin qizi

Authors

Zarina Xojiqulova Faxriddin qizi Student of the Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Asian model, public administration, Confucian governance, administrative civilization, NPM, Hong Kong experience, meritocracy.

Abstract

This study analyzes the unique evolutionary path of public administration in the Asian region, the influence of socio-cultural factors on administrative reforms, and the differences between Western and Eastern governance models. Within the framework of the concept of “administrative civilization,” the principles of Confucian ethics and meritocracy are examined.

References

Cheung, A. B. L. (2013). Can there be an Asian model of public administration? Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 249-

Kovalenko, Y. (2023). Civilizational Paradigm of the Study of Management Culture Phenomenon: Theoretical and Methodological Aspect. Socio-Cultural Management Journal, 6(1), 27-54.

Drechsler, W. (2017). Beyond the western paradigm: Confucian public administration. In Public Policy in the 'Asian Century': Concepts, Cases and Futures, Springer, 19-40.

Wong, W. (2013). The search for a model of public administration reform in Hong Kong: Weberian bureaucracy, new public management or something else? Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 297-310.

Hoshimov, O‘. (2021). The Affairs of the World: An Analysis of Social Relations and Spiritual Values (for comparative context).

Muxtor, A. (2018). Chinor: Artistic and Philosophical Views on the Hierarchy of State and Society (for academic analysis