WOMEN’S PROSE AS A RESOURCE FOR THE FORMATION OF GENDER CULTURE IN SCHOOL EDUCATION
Keywords:
women’s prose, gender culture, school education, gender equality, literary education, pedagogy, gender stereotypes, feminist literature, moral education, educational methodology.Abstract
This article examines the role of women’s prose in the formation of gender culture within the educational process. The study analyzes the pedagogical, psychological, and cultural significance of women’s literary works in shaping students’ understanding of gender equality, social roles, moral values, and interpersonal relationships. Special attention is given to the educational potential of women writers’ prose in developing tolerance, empathy, ethical thinking, and critical reflection among school students. The research is based on literary-pedagogical analysis, comparative methods, and gender studies approaches. The article also explores the integration of women’s prose into school curricula as a means of fostering democratic values and reducing gender stereotypes. The findings demonstrate that literary texts created by women writers significantly contribute to the development of gender-sensitive education and the cultivation of respectful social relations in modern schools.
References
Beauvoir, S. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books, 2011. pp. 45–52.
Showalter, E. A Literature of Their Own. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. pp. 12–26.
Connell, R. Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. pp. 67–79.
Rosenblatt, L. Literature as Exploration. New York: Modern Language Association, 1995. pp. 34–40.
Moi, T. Sexual/Textual Politics. London: Routledge, 2002. pp. 71–89.
Beauvoir, S. The Second Sex. London: Penguin Books, 2009. pp. 283–295.
Showalter, E. Speaking of Gender. New York: Routledge, 1989. pp. 1–15.
Sadker, M., Sadker, D. Failing at Fairness. New York: Scribner, 1994. pp. 98–112.
UNESCO. Gender Equality in Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2015. pp. 18–24.
Eagleton, T. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. pp. 101–119.
Gilbert, S., Gubar, S. The Madwoman in the Attic. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000. pp. 45–60.
Butler, J. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge, 1999. pp. 7–25.
Nussbaum, M. Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997. pp. 85–97.
Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum, 2000. pp. 66–79.
Banks, J. An Introduction to Multicultural Education. Boston: Pearson, 2010. pp. 54–68.
hooks, b. Teaching to Transgress. New York: Routledge, 1994. pp. 113–129.
Tannen, D. Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. pp. 21–37.
Woolf, V. A Room of One’s Own. London: Hogarth Press, 1929. pp. 3–18.
Kohlberg, L. The Psychology of Moral Development. New York: Harper & Row, 1984. pp. 142–158.
Woolf, V. Three Guineas. London: Hogarth Press, 1938. pp. 23–41.
Morrison, T. Playing in the Dark. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. pp. 32–47.
Atwood, M. The Handmaid’s Tale. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1985. pp. 101–118.
Connell, R. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. pp. 67–86.
Nussbaum, M. Poetic Justice. Boston: Beacon Press, 1995. pp. 53–72.
Giroux, H. Theory and Resistance in Education. Westport: Bergin & Garvey, 2001. pp. 144–159.
Apple, M. Ideology and Curriculum. New York: Routledge, 2004. pp. 88–103.
Culler, J. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. pp. 39–56.
Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. pp. 355–372.
UNESCO. School Violence and Bullying Report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2019. pp. 50–61.
Kandiyoti, D. Gendering the Middle East. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1996. pp. 74–91.
Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo