MODERN TENDENCIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DISCOURSE: COGNITIVE AND COMMUNICATIVE ASPECTS

Mirjonov Nosir Numonovich

Authors

Mirjonov Nosir Numonovich Independent researcher at Bukhara State University

Keywords:

Professional discourse, cognitive linguistics, terminology, communicative strategy, text typology, cognitive model, culture of communication.

Abstract

This article explores the principles of the evolutionary development of professional discourse within the context of globalization and interdisciplinary integration. The primary objective of the research is to reveal the tendencies of transition in specialized communication from a traditional terminological model to a dynamic cognitive-communicative model. In this study, the linguistic landscape of professional texts is analyzed not merely as a collection of terms, but as the verbalized form of cognitive models shaped within the specialist's linguistic consciousness.

The scientific novelty of the research is defined by identifying new stages of discursive heterogeneity (interconnectivity of various fields) and metaphorical conceptualization within professional discourse. Building upon modal-argumentative indicators identified in previous studies, the article elucidates the pragmatic transformation of professional speech and the mechanisms underlying the formation of the specialist's linguistic personality. The results serve as a conceptual framework for optimizing modern professional communication strategies and developing the communicative competence of specialists.

References

Alekseeva, L. M. (2014). Профессиональный дискурс: терминологический аспект [Professional discourse: terminological aspect]. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, (2), 5–12.

Arutyunova, N. D. (1988). Типы языковых значений: Оценка. Событие. Факт [Types of linguistic meanings: Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Nauka.

Beilinson, L. S. (2009). Профессиональный дискурс: признаки, функции, нормы [Professional discourse: signs, functions, norms]. Volgograd State University.

Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2010). Интерпретация научного текста [Interpretation of scientific text]. LKI.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.

Madumarova, S. (2021). Tibbiy matnlarda modallik va kirish so‘zlarning qo‘llanilishi xususida [On the use of modality and introductory words in medical texts]. Language and Literature Education, (4), 15–17.

Mirzoeva, V. M. (1996). Функционирование вводно-модальных средств межфразовой связи в научном (медицинском) тексте [Functioning of introductory-modal means of inter-sentential connection in scientific (medical) text] [Candidate dissertation]. Tver State University.

Mishlanova, S. L. (2002). Медицинский дискурс: теоретические основы и принципы анализа [Medical discourse: theoretical foundations and principles of analysis]. Perm State University.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Vasileva, V. V. (2005). Метатекст в научном дискурсе [Metatext in scientific discourse]. M, 45–56.