THE FORMATION OF DIFFERENTIAL AND INTEGRAL CALCULUS BASED ON THE WORKS OF NEWTON AND LEIBNIZ

Authors

  • Tufliev Egamberdi Olimovich Senior lecturer at Qarshi State Technical University
  • Bozarov Dilmurod Uralovich Acting Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics University of Economics and Pedagogy

Keywords:

differential calculus, integral calculus, Newton, Leibniz, fluxion, differential, infinitesimals, quadrature, tangent, history of mathematics.

Abstract

This article examines the historical and mathematical formation of differential and integral calculus on the basis of the scientific works of Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. The study analyzes the idea of infinitesimals, the problems of tangents and quadratures, the need to express motion and rates of change mathematically, Newton’s method of fluxions, and Leibniz’s symbolic system of differentials and integrals. It is argued that calculus did not emerge suddenly, but was the logical continuation of earlier mathematical ideas developed by Cavalieri, Fermat, Descartes, Barrow, Wallis, and other scholars. Newton interpreted calculus mainly through mechanical motion and time-dependent quantities, whereas Leibniz transformed it into a general symbolic and algorithmic method. The article also discusses the Newton–Leibniz priority dispute, the differences between their approaches, and the methodological importance of studying this historical process in modern higher mathematics education. The practical section contains two solved examples illustrating differentiation and integration in the context of the historical development of calculus.

References

Zeuthen, H. G. History of Mathematics in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Translated from German by P. Novikov; edited, annotated, and introduced by M. Vygodsky. Moscow–Leningrad: ONTI, 1938.

Newton, I. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Londini: Jussu Societatis Regiae ac Typis Josephi Streater, 1687.

Newton, I. The Method of Fluxions and Infinite Series; with its Application to the Geometry of Curve-lines. Translated from the Latin by John Colson. London: Henry Woodfall; sold by John Nourse, 1736.

Leibniz, G. W. Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis, itemque tangentibus, quae nec fractas nec irrationales quantitates moratur, et singulare pro illis calculi genus. Acta Eruditorum. Lipsiae, October 1684, pp. 467–473.

Leibniz, G. W. De geometria recondita et analysi indivisibilium atque infinitorum. Acta Eruditorum. Lipsiae, June 1686, pp. 292–300.

Struik, D. J. A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200–1800. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Boyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. New York: Dover Publications, 1959.

Edwards, C. H. The Historical Development of the Calculus. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.

Katz, V. J. A History of Mathematics: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2009.

Hall, A. R. Philosophers at War: The Quarrel between Newton and Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Tufliev Egamberdi Olimovich, & Bozarov Dilmurod Uralovich. (2026). THE FORMATION OF DIFFERENTIAL AND INTEGRAL CALCULUS BASED ON THE WORKS OF NEWTON AND LEIBNIZ. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 13(5), 469–476. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/6645