Advanced Molecular-Scale Biological Sensing Systems for Detecting Contaminants in Edible Commodities
Keywords:
Nanobiosensors, Food adulteration, Molecular sensing systems, Quorum sensingAbstract
The increasing incidence of chemical contamination and adulteration in edible commodities has intensified global concerns regarding food safety, public health, and regulatory compliance. Conventional detection methods, although reliable, often suffer from limitations such as high operational cost, longer processing time, and lack of real-time monitoring capability. In this context, molecular-scale biological sensing systems, particularly nanobiosensors, have emerged as a transformative solution for rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of contaminants in food matrices. These systems integrate principles of nanotechnology, molecular biology, and analytical chemistry to achieve ultra-low detection limits and real-time analytical responsiveness.
This paper critically investigates advanced molecular-scale biosensing systems designed for identifying chemical contaminants, microbial toxins, and adulterants in edible commodities. Emphasis is placed on the role of quorum sensing-based biological interactions, biofilm dynamics, and nanoscale transduction mechanisms in enhancing detection efficiency. Studies on microbial communication modeling and biofilm inhibition provide foundational insights into biological signal processing systems applicable to biosensor engineering (Pérez-Velázquez et al., 2016; Papenfort and Bassler, 2016). Furthermore, mathematical and computational models of microbial systems contribute to the understanding of signal propagation and interference in biosensing environments (Klapper and Dockery, 2010; Fozard et al., 2012).
Recent advancements in nanobiosensor applications highlight their effectiveness in detecting pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in food and agricultural systems (Berset and Holzer, 1995; Kipopoulou et al., 1999). The integration of nanoscale materials with biosensing platforms enhances selectivity and sensitivity, allowing early-stage detection of food adulteration and contamination. According to Agarwal et al. (2025), nanobiosensor-based systems significantly improve analytical precision in identifying chemical adulterants in food matrices, enabling next-generation food safety monitoring frameworks (Agarwal et al., 2025).
The paper further explores signal transduction mechanisms, molecular communication models, and Raman/NIR spectroscopy-based sensing approaches for contaminant detection. The synthesis of biological signaling theory with nanomaterial engineering provides a robust interdisciplinary framework for future biosensor development. Overall, this research highlights the critical role of molecular-scale biosensing technologies in advancing food safety, regulatory monitoring, and contamination prevention strategies in modern food systems.
References
Agarwal, R., Harini, P., Sri Varshni, J. (2025). New Insights on Nano Biosensors Applications for Chemical and Adulterant in Foods. In: Sillu, D., Bey Hing, G., Akhtar, N. (eds) Nanobiosensors for the Food Industry. Smart Nanomaterials Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-0136-6_9
J. D. Berset and R. Holzer, "Organic micropollutants in Swiss agriculture: distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ( PAH) and polychlorinated biphenyls ( PCB) in soil , liquid manure , sewage sludge and compost samples: a comparative study, " International Journal of Environ. Anal. Chem. vol. 59, Apr. 1995 , pp. 145-165, doi:10.1080/03067319508041324.
A. Corral-Lugo, A. Daddaoua, A. Ortega, M. Espinosa-Urgel, and T. Krell, “Rosmarinic acid is a homoserine lactone mimic produced by plants that activates a bacterial quorum-sensing regulator,” Sci. Signal., vol. 9, no. 409, p. RA1, 2016.
J. A. Fozard, M. Lees, J. R. King, and B. S. Logan, “Inhibition of quorum sensing in a computational biofilm simulation,” Biosystems, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2012.
Klapper and J. Dockery, “Mathematical description of microbial biofilms,” SIAM Rev., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 221–265, 2010.
A. M. Kipopoulou, E. Manoli and C. Samara, "Bioconcentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vegetables grown in an industrial area, " Environ. Pollut. vol. 106, Sep.1999, pp. 369-380, doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00107-4.
D. P. Martins, M. T. Barros, and S. Balasubramaniam, “Using competing bacterial communication to disassemble biofilms,” in Proc. 3rd ACM Int. Conf. Nanoscale Comput. Commun., 2016, pp. 1–6.
D. P. Martins, K. Leetanasaksakul, M. T. Barros, A. Thamchaipenet, W. Donnelly, and S. Balasubramaniam, “Molecular communications pulse-based jamming model for bacterial biofilm suppression,” IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 533–542, Oct. 2018.
N. Michelusi, J. Boedicker, M. Y. El-Naggar, and U. Mitra, “Queuing models for abstracting interactions in bacterial communities,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 584–599, Mar. 2016.
E. Paluch, J. Rewak-Soroczyńska, I. Jedrusik, E. Mazurkiewicz, and K. Jermakow, “Prevention of biofilm formation by quorum quenching,” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1871–1881, 2020.
Papenfort and B. L. Bassler, “Quorum sensing signal–response systems in gram-negative bacteria,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 576–588, 2016.
Pérez-Velázquez, M. Gölgeli, and R. García-Contreras, “Mathematical modelling of bacterial quorum sensing: A review,” Bull. Math. Biol., vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1585–1639, 2016.
Y. Shi, XinLu Feng and Ping Sun, "Rapid Identification of Organic Contaminants in Waste Water by Near Infrared Spectroscopy, " Chinese Journal of Spectroscopy Laboratory, vol. 22, May, 2005, pp. 575–577. doi:CNKI:SUN:GPSS.0.2005-03-036.
Shona Stewart, John S. Maier and Patrick J. Treado. Water quality monitoring by Raman spectral analysis. United States Patent: US 6,950,184, Sep. 27, 2005.
Changhu Yang, Xiaoying Zeng and Jiaxin Liao, "study on Raman spectrum in comparing impurity concentration in water, " Environmental Monitoring in China, vol. 24, Feb. 2008, pp. 21–23, doi:CNKI:SUN:IAOB.0.2008-01-006.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo