MARKEDNESS-BASED ACCOUNT OF PRODUCTION–PERCEPTION ASYMMETRIES IN UZBEK LEARNERS’ ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH FRICATIVES
Keywords:
Uzbek EFL learners; English fricatives; markedness; speech perception; speech production; /θ/ /ð/ /ʒ/Abstract
This article reports a production–perception study of English fricatives by Uzbek learners of English, with a focus on markedness and the extent to which perception predicts production. Forty upper-intermediate to advanced Uzbek EFL learners (mean age = 28) completed (i) a controlled reading task and (ii) a listening discrimination task targeting six English fricatives: /θ, ð, s, z, ʃ, ʒ/. Responses (N = 960 tokens per task) were coded for accuracy and checked by three trained raters with acoustic verification in Praat. Overall, perception accuracy (88.85%) significantly exceeded production accuracy (81.24%), supporting the perception-first account of L2 segmental acquisition (p < .05). Marked fricatives absent from Uzbek (/θ, ð/) and a low-frequency loanword phoneme (/ʒ/) showed disproportionate production difficulty, with /ð/ produced least accurately (62.50%). Substitution patterns reflected strong L1 transfer: /θ/→/s/ and /ð/→/θ, z/ were frequent, and /ʒ/ was often realized as /dʒ/. Perception–production correlations varied by segment; /θ/ showed a strong positive association (r = .532, p = .001), whereas most other fricatives showed weak or negligible correlations. The findings refine markedness-based predictions by showing that markedness can affect production more than perception, and they motivate integrated perception–production training for interdental and postalveolar fricatives in Uzbek EFL contexts.
References
Abduazizov, A. (2007). English phonetics (3rd ed., R. Alimardonov, Ed.). Tashkent: Musiqa Press.
Aminjonov, A., Tulanboev, M., Isroilov, M., & Kim, J. M. (2024) Production and Perception of English Interdental Fricatives by Native Uzbek Speakers. The Journal of Foreign Studies, 68, 35–64.
Best, C. T. (1995). ‘A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception’ in W. Strange (ed.): Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. York Press, pp. 171–204.
Bohn, O., & Flege, J. (1990). Interlingual Identification and the Role of Foreign Language Experience in L2 Vowel Perception, Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(3), 303–28.
Brannen, K. J. (2011). The perception and production of interdental fricatives in second language acquisition [Doctoral thesis, McGill University, Canada].
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: a reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, A., Weber, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N. (2004). Patterns of English phoneme confusion by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3668–3678.
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315-330.
Evans, B. G., & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15–31.
Flege, J. E. (1991). Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In T. Hueber & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 249–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: theory, finding, and problems. In Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-linguistic research, edited by W. Strange.
Gimson, A. C. (1980). An Introduction to the pronunciation of English. (3rd ed.). London: University College London.
Gordon, M. (2016). Phonological typology. Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against Markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42(1), 25–70.
Isroilov, M. (2021). The orthographic differences and pronunciation difficulties by Uzbek speakers learning spoken English [Master’s thesis, Kangwon National University, Republic of Korea].
Joh, J., & Lee, S. (2001). Relationship between Sound Perception and Production in L2 Phonology Acquisition. Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 17, 127–45.
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Sh. (2011). Perception and production of English fricative sounds by advanced Korean EFL learners. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 17(2), 259–281.
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press.
Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
Owolabi, D. (2012). Production and Perception Problems of English Dental Fricatives by Yoruba Speakers of English as a Second Language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 1108– 13.
Rauber, A. S., Escudero, P., Bion, R. A. H., & Baptista, B. O. (2005). The interrelation between the perception and production of English vowels by native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Interspeech, 2913–2916.
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The Acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese Learners of English: Evidence that Speech Production Can Precede Speech Perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–61.
Stonham, J. (2018). Doing phonetics: An introduction to English and general phonetics. Seoul, Korea: Kyung Moon Publishers.
Swan, M., & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Trubetzkoy, N. (1931). Die phonologischen Systeme [The phonological systems]. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 96–116.
Tulanboev, M. S. (2023). Production and perception of interdental fricative sounds in English by Uzbek learners [Master’s thesis, Kangwon National University, Republic of Korea].
Tukhtasinova Z. M. & Zokirova G. V. K. (2016). Common pronunciation mistakes of Uzbek learners in speaking English. Young Scientist, 11 (115), 1719–1720.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo