THE USE OF GEOGRAPHIC TERMS IN THE NOMINATIVE FIELD IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
Keywords:
linguistic field; nominative field; toponymy; phonological stratum; morphological stratum; lexicosemantic stratum; center–periphery; paradigmatic–syntagmatic; affixation; color semantics; number semantics; cognitive linguistics; typology; Uzbek; EnglishAbstract
This article presents a concise, systematic IMRaD-format analysis of the use of geographic (toponymic) terms within the nominative field in English and Uzbek. The field concept in linguistics is traced from Saussure through European and Russian structuralism to functional and cognitive orientations. Comparative analysis addresses phonological, morphological, and lexicosemantic strata in the formation of toponyms, center–periphery relations, paradigmatic and syntagmatic connections, and nominative strategies in both languages. Principal findings show the prominence of suffix/prefix models (Uzbek agglutinative affixation; English historical Germanic suffixes and directional prefixes), color/number/relief semantics, animate–inanimate noun oppositions, and multinuclear structures as determinants of field organization. Practical recommendations are provided for corpusbased clustering, distributional and componential analyses.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo