EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION: A MARKETING AND MONITORING PERSPECTIVE
Keywords:
Simulation-based learning; physiology education; medical students; active learning; clinical reasoning; medical educationAbstract
Physiology education plays a crucial role in medical training by providing a foundational understanding of normal body functions. However, traditional teaching methods often fail to adequately engage students or facilitate the application of theoretical knowledge to clinical practice. Simulation-based learning has emerged as an innovative educational approach that promotes active learning through realistic, interactive experiences. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based learning in teaching physiology to medical students. A mixed-methods research design was employed, comparing traditional teaching methods with simulation-integrated instruction. The results demonstrated significant improvements in students’ academic performance, engagement, and ability to apply physiological concepts in clinical contexts. The findings suggest that simulation-based learning is an effective teaching strategy that enhances conceptual understanding and prepares medical students for future clinical practice.
References
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning. Medical Teacher. 2005;27(1):10–28.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? Academic Medicine. 2011;86(6):706–711.
Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978–988.
Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2010;3(4):348–352.
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004;93(3):223–231.
