TYPES AND FUNCTIONS OF INTERNET SLANG
Keywords:
Internet slang, digital communication, online discourse, language variation, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, computer-mediated communication, identity constructionAbstract
This article examines the types and communicative functions of Internet slang as a distinctive linguistic phenomenon emerging from digital communication environments. Internet slang is analyzed as a rapidly evolving form of non-standard language shaped by social media platforms, online forums, instant messaging, and virtual communities. The study proposes a typological classification of Internet slang based on structural, semantic, and functional criteria, including abbreviations, acronyms, blends, emotive markers, graphic symbols, and multimodal elements. Particular attention is given to the pragmatic functions of Internet slang, such as expressing emotions, constructing online identity, fostering group solidarity, managing interpersonal distance, and increasing communicative efficiency in fast-paced digital interactions. The article argues that Internet slang not only reflects technological innovation but also represents broader sociocultural and pragmatic shifts in contemporary language use. The findings highlight the role of Internet slang as a productive linguistic resource that reshapes norms of communication and contributes to ongoing processes of language change.References
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.
Baron, N. S. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). “Computer-mediated communication and linguistic landscapes.” Language & Communication, 35, 1–10.
Herring, S. C. (2007). “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” Language@Internet, 4(1), 1–37.
Tagliamonte, S., & Denis, D. (2008). “Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language.” American Speech, 83(1), 3–34.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. London: Sage.
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (Eds.). (2007). The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eisenstein, J. (2015). “Systematic patterns in the informal speech of social media.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(2), 161–188.
Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2014). The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. London: Palgrave Macmillan.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo