A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CONCEPT OF TIME IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Mirzayeva Mexrangiz Murodullo kizi University of Exact and Social Sciences 2nd-year Master’s Student

Keywords:

time, tense, aspect, metaphor, cognition, comparative linguistics, English, Uzbek, temporality.

Abstract

Time is a universal cognitive category, yet languages conceptualize and express it through different grammatical, lexical, and metaphorical systems. This research presents a comparative analysis of the concept of time in English and Uzbek, focusing on grammatical representation, semantic categories, metaphorical conceptualization, and cultural interpretation. The study examines tense–aspect–mood systems, temporal adverbials, culturally rooted idioms, and conceptual metaphors, revealing significant structural and cognitive differences between the two languages. Findings show that while English relies heavily on grammaticalized tense forms and linear metaphors of time, Uzbek expresses temporality through aspectual markers, postpositional constructions, and culturally grounded metaphors reflecting cyclicity and collectivist worldviews. The analysis demonstrates that linguistic representation of time is inseparable from cultural cognition, worldview, and communicative needs of linguistic communities.

References

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge University Press.

Evans, V. (2004). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. John Benjamins.

Khlopina, L. (2019). Temporal Structures in Turkic Languages. Journal of Linguistic Typology, 23(2), 45–67.

Bozorov, O. (2020). O‘zbek tilida zamon kategoriyasi va uning nutqiy ifodasi. Toshkent: Fan nashriyoti.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10 — Updated on 2025-12-11

Versions

How to Cite

Mirzayeva Mexrangiz Murodullo kizi. (2025). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CONCEPT OF TIME IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 12(12), 373–375. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/4160 (Original work published December 10, 2025)