ADAPTIVE EVENT-SOURCED FRAMEWORKS FOR REAL-TIME HUMAN ACTIVITY RISK ANALYSIS: INTEGRATING INTERPRETABLE MACHINE LEARNING, CONTINUAL LEARNING, AND MEMS SENSING FOR ROBUST DEPLOYMENT

Authors

  • Dr. Elena R. Moretti Faculty of Computational Systems, University of Lisbon, Portugal

Keywords:

Event sourcing, human activity recognition, interpretable machine learning, continual learning

Abstract

This article advances a comprehensive, integrative framework for real-time human activity risk analysis by synthesizing event-sourced architectures, interpretable machine learning, continual learning approaches, and inertial sensing optimization. The work situates Kafka-style event sourcing as the architectural spine for low-latency, high-throughput telemetry ingestion and stateful stream processing and pairs it with MEMS accelerometer and inclinometer measurement techniques to maximize signal fidelity for human activity recognition. Drawing on prior empirical and methodological studies of human activity classification with smartphone and inertial sensors, on optimization methods for orientation and displacement measurements, and on modern operational practices in MLOps and drift detection, the article articulates a methodology that preserves interpretability while enabling production-scale adaptation to covariate drift and concept drift. The method emphasizes multiple-instance learning for sparse transactional contexts, drift-aware model lifecycle management via serverless and continual learning patterns, and uses explainable model families and post-hoc explanation methods to ensure traceability and regulatory compliance. Results presented are descriptive, synthesizing insights from the cited literature and projecting expected behaviors under various deployment regimes. The discussion probes limitations, trade-offs between latency and model complexity, operational risks, and proposes future research directions encompassing federated event-sourced learning, privacy-preserving telemetry, and tighter sensor–algorithm co-design. This article aims to be a reference for researchers and practitioners seeking to design production-ready risk analysis pipelines that are both rigorous and interpretable.

References

Kesarpu, S., & Dasari, H. P. (2025). Kafka Event Sourcing for Real-Time Risk Analysis. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3).

World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 11 November 2020).

Tufts Medical Center. Can a cough damage my lungs? Available online: https://hhma.org/can-a-cough-damage-my-lungs/ (accessed on 10 November 2022).

Zakaria, N. A.; Kuwae, Y.; Tamura, T.; Minato, K.; Kanaya, S. Quantitative analysis of fall risk using TUG test. Comput. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 18, 426–437.

Long, H. M.; Pietrosanto, A. A Robust Orientation System for Inclinometer with Full-Redundancy in Heavy Industry. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 21, 5853–5860.

Long, H. M.; Iacono, S. D.; Paciello, V.; Pietrosanto, A. Measurement Optimization for Orientation Tracking Based on No Motion No Integration Technique. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70, 9503010.

Long, H. M.; Carratu, M.; Ugwiri, M. A.; Paciello, V.; Pietrosanto, A. A New Technique for Optimization of Linear Displacement Measurement Based on MEMS Accelerometer. Proceedings of the 2020 International Semiconductor Conference (CAS), Sinaia, Romania, 7–9 October 2020.

Kang, J.; Shin, J.; Shin, J.; Lee, D.; Choi, A. Robust Human Activity Recognition by Integrating Image and Accelerometer Sensor Data Using Deep Fusion Network. Sensors, 2022, 22, 174.

Khan, Y. A.; Imaduddin, S.; Prabhat, R.; Wajid, M. Classification of Human Motion Activities using Mobile Phone Sensors and Deep Learning Model. Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 25–26 March 2022, pp. 1381–1386.

Zebin, T.; Scully, P.; Ozanyan, K. B. Evaluation of supervised classification algorithms for human activity recognition with inertial sensors. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Sensors, Glasgow, UK, 29 October–1 November 2017, pp. 1–3.

Tian, Y.; Chen, W. MEMS-based human activity recognition using smartphone. Proceedings of the 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Chengdu, China, 27–29 July 2016, pp. 3984–3989.

Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable, 2nd Edition, 2022. Available online: https://www.amazon.in/InterpretableMachine-Learning-Making-Explainable-ebook/dp/B09TL345QM

Hulstaert, L. Engineering MLOps: Rapidly build, test, and manage production-ready machine learning life cycles at scale. Packt Publishing, 2021. Available online: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oH8qEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover

Céspedes Sisniega, et al. (2024). Efficient and scalable covariate drift detection in machine learning systems with serverless computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 161, 174-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.07.010

Lomonaco, V. Continual Learning for Production Systems, IEEE MLOps Conference Proceedings, 2023, 234–248. Available online: https://medium.com/continual-ai/continual-learning-for-production-systems-304cc9f60603

Zhang, T.; et al. Multiple instance learning for credit risk assessment with transaction data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161 (2018): 65–77.

Sanz, Jorge L. C., and Yada Zhu. Toward scalable artificial intelligence in finance. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC). IEEE, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Dr. Elena R. Moretti. (2025). ADAPTIVE EVENT-SOURCED FRAMEWORKS FOR REAL-TIME HUMAN ACTIVITY RISK ANALYSIS: INTEGRATING INTERPRETABLE MACHINE LEARNING, CONTINUAL LEARNING, AND MEMS SENSING FOR ROBUST DEPLOYMENT. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 12(09), 511–518. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/4007