INTEGRATED ADAPTIVE DEVSECOPS FOR FINANCIAL AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE: LEVERAGING EXPLAINABLE AI, THREAT INTELLIGENCE, AND MODEL RISK MANAGEMENT FOR ENHANCED RISK AWARENESS
Keywords:
Dev SecOps, model risk management, explainable AIAbstract
This article proposes a unified, adaptive framework for integrating model risk management, explainable machine learning, and threat intelligence into DevSecOps pipelines for financial services and critical-infrastructure domains. The framework is motivated by the rapid adoption of AI/ML in financial services, the unique model governance challenges that arise from automated decisioning, and the operational pressures of continuous delivery (Financial Stability Board, 2017; Bennett, 2017). We synthesize multicriteria decision methods, model-risk governance principles, and contemporary DevSecOps practices to develop a practical, theoretically grounded process that prioritizes model interpretability, data privacy, and automated pre-deployment risk mitigation (Alimohammadlou & Bonyani, 2017; Holzinger et al., 2018; Díaz et al., 2019). The methodology emphasizes (1) continuous model validation and governance controls that sit within CI/CD and IaC workflows (Bennett, 2017; Crespo et al., 2017); (2) combining MCDM approaches with explainable AI to make trade-offs transparent for stakeholders (De Almeida et al., 2017; Alimohammadlou & Bonyani, 2017); and (3) enriched pipeline automation incorporating threat intelligence to stop high-risk artifacts prior to production deployment (Díaz et al., 2019; Malik, 2025). We present a descriptive results section that outlines expected outcomes, detection and mitigation pathways, and organizational enablers, and we discuss limitations, governance implications, and future research directions. The proposed approach is intended to be actionable for risk and engineering leads in banks, energy markets, and other AI-driven operation environments while also contributing to academic discourse on aligning model risk, cybersecurity, and rapid software delivery lifecycles.
References
Alimohammadlou, M., & Bonyani, A. (2017). A novel hybrid MCDM model for financial performance evaluation in Iran’s food industry. Accounting and Financial Control, 1(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.05
Bennett, D. E. (2017). Governance and organizational requirements for effective model risk management. Journal of Risk Model Validation, 11(4), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2017.188
Cobb, S. (2016). Data privacy and data protection: US law and legislation. Eset, (April), 1–16. Retrieved from https://www.welivesecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/US-data-privacy-legislation-whitepaper.pdf
Crespo, I., Kumar, P., & Noteboom, P. (2017). The evolution of model risk management. McKinsey Global Institute, 1–8.
Dagoumas, A. S., Koltsaklis, N. E., & Panapakidis, I. P. (2017). An integrated model for risk management in electricity trade. Energy, 124, 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.064
Dash, S. (2018). An Efficient AI Model for Financial Market Prediction Optimized by SVR. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 6(5), 1884–1889. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.5307
De Almeida, A. T., Alencar, M. H., Garcez, T. V., & Ferreira, R. J. P. (2017, April 1). A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective models applied in risk management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw021
Díaz, J., Pérez, J. E., Lopez-Peña, M. A., Mena, G. A., & Yagüe, A. (2019). Self-service cybersecurity monitoring as enabler for DevSecops. IEEE Access, 7, 100283–100295. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930000
Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Financial Services - Market Developments and Financial Stability Implications. Financial Stability Board, (November), 45. Retrieved from http://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financialservice/
Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Weippl, E., & Tjoa, A. M. (2018). Current advances, trends and challenges of machine learning and knowledge extraction: From machine learning to explainable AI. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11015 LNCS, pp. 1–8). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99740-7_1
Myrbakken, G., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2017). DevSecOps: A Multivocal Literature Review. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 17–29.
Forsgren, N., Humble, J., & Kim, G. (2018). Accelerate: State of DevOps. DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA).
Debois, P. (2011). DevOps: A Software Revolution in the Making. Cutter IT Journal, 24(8).
Allspaw, J., & Hammond, P. (2009). 10+ Deploys per Day: Dev and Ops Cooperation at Flickr. Velocity Conference.
OWASP Foundation. OWASP Top Ten. https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/
Kim, G., Humble, J., Debois, P., & Willis, J. (2016). The DevOps Handbook. IT Revolution Press.
Zaydi, A., & Bouchaib, H. (2020). From DevOps to DevSecOps: The Role of Security and Compliance in ITSM. International Journal of Information Systems Engineering (IJISE), 8(2).
Malik, G. (2025). Integrating Threat Intelligence with DevSecOps: Automating Risk Mitigation before Code Hits Production. Utilitas Mathematica, 122(2), 309-340.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo