USING INTERACTIVE METHODS IN MOTHER TONGUE LESSONS

Authors

  • Farida Ahadova Student of TERDU

Keywords:

interactive methods, mother tongue, communication, creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, dialogic speech, primary education.

Abstract

This article explores the effectiveness of using interactive teaching methods in mother tongue lessons in primary education. It emphasizes how learner-centered approaches, such as pair and group discussions, role-play, problem-based tasks, and visual aids, help improve students’ speaking, listening, and communicative competence. The use of interactive methods fosters creativity, critical thinking, and collaborative learning, making the teaching process more engaging and meaningful. Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of integrating modern pedagogical technologies to develop students’ dialogic and written language skills in accordance with contemporary educational standards.

References

Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

Chan, K. K., Tong, Y., & van Aalst, J. (2019). Progressive dialogue in computer-supported collaborative knowledge building. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 205–217). Routledge.

Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. Routledge.

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-12

How to Cite

Farida Ahadova. (2025). USING INTERACTIVE METHODS IN MOTHER TONGUE LESSONS. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 12(11), 215–217. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/3885