INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN POLYSEMY AND HOMONYMY IN AMBIVALENCE: ISSUES OF LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS
Keywords:
ambivalence, polysemy, homonymy, wordplay, pun, aesthetic value, linguistic system, semantic analysis.Abstract
This article addresses the issue of the interrelation between polysemy and homonymy in the process of analyzing ambivalent texts. On the basis of the phenomenon of wordplay (pun), various scholarly perspectives are examined, highlighting the differences between the terms pun and wordplay, as well as the role of polysemy and homonymy in determining aesthetic value. Moreover, contradictions in evaluating homonymy as a systemic phenomenon and its significance in shaping ambivalent texts are discussed on a scientific basis.
References
V. Vakurov. Rechevye sredstva humor and satire. M., 1969. – 54 p.
V. Zueva. K voprosu o stylisticheskom usepolzovanii mnogoznachnosti i homonymii v zyke khodojestvennoy literatury. M., 1952. – 146 p.
D. Shmelev. Lexicon of problematic semantic analysis. M., 1973. – 278 p.
Y. Balaj. Syntagmatization and lexicalization. Ob.: "Lexicology and lexicography", M., 1972. - 198 p.
S. Ullmann. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford, 1962. – 278 p.
V. Komissarov. Slovo o perevode. M., 1972. - 215 p.
Y. Apresyan. Lexical semantics. M., 1974. – 366 p.
I. Abrames. Semanticheskie osnovy phraseologicheskogo pun. "Trudy SamGU, Nov. Series," vol. 205. – 286 p.
A. Zholkovsky. Ob usilenii. "Strukturno-typologicheskie issledovaniya", M., 1972. - 431 p.
Y. Kurilovich. Essay on linguistics. M., 1962. – 463 p.
Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo