STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC AND FUNCTIONAL-STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF THE ANTONYMIC CONCEPTS OF “HONESTY” AND “THEFT” IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LINGUOCULTURES

Authors

  • Maxkamova Durdona

Keywords:

concept, antonymy, verbalizer, linguoculture, evaluation, semantics, discourse, stylistics

Abstract

This article examines the concepts of “honesty” and “theft” as opposing semantic units in the English and Uzbek languages. Their verbalizers – that is, the linguistic means by which these concepts are expressed—are comparatively analyzed from structural-semantic, stylistic, and functional perspectives. The study identifies cultural characteristics, cognitive-linguistic foundations, and contextual uses in discourse. The results reveal the evaluative components and semantic load of these concepts in national cognition.

References

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford University Press.

Ўzbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. (2006). Tashkent: O‘zME.

Cambridge Dictionary. (2024). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary.

Sharipov, S. (2017). Lingvokulturologiya asoslari. Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya.

Published

2025-06-03

How to Cite

Maxkamova Durdona. (2025). STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC AND FUNCTIONAL-STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF THE ANTONYMIC CONCEPTS OF “HONESTY” AND “THEFT” IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LINGUOCULTURES. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 12(05), 877–879. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/3234