NEUROAESTHETIC APPROACHES TO ESL: INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF ART-INTEGRATED INSTRUCTION ON LEXICAL ACQUISITION AND COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT
Keywords:
neuroaesthetics, second language acquisition, visual arts integration, vocabulary retention, educational neuroscience, multisensory learning, ESL pedagogy, affective engagement, cognitive activation, language education innovation.Abstract
This study examines the pedagogical potential of neuroaesthetic principles in the field of English as a Second Language (ESL) instruction, with a specific focus on their influence on lexical acquisition and cognitive engagement among young learners. Grounded in the interdisciplinary nexus of educational neuroscience, applied linguistics, and visual arts, the research employs a quasi-experimental methodology to compare the outcomes of traditional vocabulary instruction with those of an art-integrated approach. The experimental group, comprised of Grade 5 ESL learners, participated in lessons incorporating curated visual art stimuli and guided aesthetic tasks aligned with targeted lexical fields. Pre- and post-intervention assessments, learner reflections, and optional electroencephalogram (EEG) data were analyzed to evaluate vocabulary retention and learner engagement. Preliminary findings indicate that art-enriched instruction fosters significantly higher levels of emotional and cognitive involvement, resulting in improved lexical retention. The study contributes to emerging scholarship advocating for multisensory and affectively charged language instruction grounded in neuroaesthetic frameworks.
References
Bergh, H., & Bahloul, A. (2018). Visual arts and language acquisition: The role of images in vocabulary teaching. Journal of Art Education, 55(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1426887
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics: A review of the literature. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(4), 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00521
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137-155.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Wright, A. (2010). The role of the arts in language learning. Language Teaching, 43(3), 391-414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990437
Zeki, S. (1999). Art and the brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6), 76-96.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo