REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN WOMEN`S EDUCATION IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOUTH AND NORTH INDIA
Keywords:
women's education, South India, North India, regional characteristics, historical analysis, socio-cultural factors, educational policy, gender equality.Abstract
This study examines the regional characteristics of women's education in South and North India through a comprehensive analysis of historical, geographical, social, cultural, religious, and political factors. The research explores how colonial policies, post-independence reforms, and regional socio-economic structures have influenced the formation and development of women's education in these two regions. In South India, progressive educational reforms, social movements, and state interventions have contributed to higher literacy rates and greater access to education for women. In contrast, in North India, traditional socio-cultural norms, economic disparities, and gender inequalities have resulted in lower female enrollment and literacy rates. This study employs a comparative analysis to identify the key factors shaping women’s educational opportunities across these regions. The findings provide a deeper understanding of regional disparities in women’s education in India and offer a scientific foundation for developing effective educational policies aimed at promoting gender equality.
References
Satapura Sarkar. Manusmriti: A critical analysis. (2022). //International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies (IJHSSS). Vol. 8. Issue 6. – P. 255-260.
Shanmugam P., Elamaran R. (2023). Empowering women through Dravidian ideology: A case study of gender equity in dindigul district. // Journal of Namibian studies, 35. – P. 5462- 5473.
Anandhi S. (2019). Women`s question in the Dravidian movement 1925-1948. //Social scientist, 19 (5/6). – P. 24-41
Ramachandran V. (1997). Gender and social equity in primary education hierarchies of access. Sage publication.
Kavitha M. (2023). The role of education in women empowerment in Kerala. // ResearchGate. – P. 10-16.
Jeffrey Sachs. [2005]. The end of poverty: Ecomnomic possibilities for our time. USA.: Penguin Press. – 416 p.
Jared Diamond. [1997]. Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human socities. USA. – 480 p.
Amartya Sen. [1999]. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred Knopf. – 366 p.
Dr. Ramesh H. P. [2021]. Social status of Indian women in different periods in patriarchal society. //International multidisciplinary electronic journal. Vol. 5. Issue 4. – P. 8.
Basanta Nirola. [2018]. Patriarchy and the status of women in the society. https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/12/role-of-patriarchy-and-status-of-women-in-indian-society/
Sree Devi. [2018]. Marumakkathayam system. //IJRAR. Vol. 5, Issue 1. – P. 680-687.
Кудрявцев М.К. [1992]. Кастовая система в Индии. – Москва: Наука, Изд. фирма "Вост. лит.". – C. 206.
Patricial Jeffery. (1979). Frogs in a Well: Indian Women in Purdah. Zed Press. – India. – P. 187.
Prem Chowdhry. (1993). Persistence of a Custom: Cultural centrality of Ghunghat. // Social Scientist. Vol 21. Issue 11. – P. 91-112.
Census of India, 2011.
Nussbaum M.C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. // Feminist Economics. 2003. – P. 33-59. https://philarchive.org/rec/NUSCAF?utm
Government Policies towards Women Empowerment: Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, SSA, Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya, Saakshar Bharat, SABLA, STEP – Civilsdaily. https://www.civilsdaily.com/government-policies-towards-women-empowerment-beti-bachao-beti-padhao-ssa-kasturba-gandhi-balika-vidyalaya-saakshar-bharat-sabla-step/
Abhijit Banerjww, Lakshmi Iyer. (2005). History, Institutions, and Economic performance: The Legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American Economic Review. – P. 1190-1213.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo