BASIC PRINCIPLES OF PARADIGMATIC RELATIONS IN TERMINOLOGY
Keywords:
terminology systems, linguistic terminology, paradigmatic relations, polyparadigmaticity.Abstract
The article presents the author's approach to understanding paradigmatic relations in terminology. The structure of the terminological field and terminological system are differentiated, which makes it possible to use them in describing the processes of transterminologization and determinologization. Variation and synonymy are defined as zones of development of terminological systems. Homonymy and paronymy are assessed as certainly undesirable phenomena in terminology.
References
Leychik V.M. Terminovedenie: Predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology: Subject, Methods, Structure]. Moscow, 2009. 256 p.
Shumaylova M.S. Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya i funktsionirovaniya terminologii Internet v nemetskom yazyke [Current Issues of the Development and Functioning of Internet Terminology in the German Language: Diss.]. Omsk, 2005. 193 p.
Leonova S.A. Semanticheskie otnosheniya antonimii v tekhnicheskoy terminologii (na primere terminopolya “avtomatizirovannyy elektroprivod”) [Semantic Antonymic Relations in Technical Terminology (Based on the Example of the Term-Field “Automatic Electric Drive”)]. Vestnik MGOU: elektronnyy zhurnal, 2013, no. 3, p. 15. DOI: 10.18384/2224-0209-2013-3-699
Fedotova A.K. Antonyms in Terminology (Based on the Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 21st Century Edited by G. N. Sklyarevskaya). J. Appl. Linguist. Lexicogr., 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 76‒84. DOI: 10.33910/2687-0215-2020-2-1-76-84
Danilenko V.P. Russkaya terminologiya. Opyt lingvisticheskogo opisaniya [Russian Terminology: Experience of Linguistic Description]. Moscow, 1977. 246 p.
Tatarinov V.A. Obshchee terminovedenie [General Terminology]. Moscow, 2006. 528 p.






Azerbaijan
Türkiye
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Republic of Korea
Japan
India
United States of America
Kosovo