UNVEILING NOVEL AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT: APPLYING FORENSIC RESEARCH FOR PRINT ADVERTISING ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Niels Schmidt University of Southern Denmark

Keywords:

Audience measurement, print advertising analysis, forensic research

Abstract

This research paper introduces a novel approach to audience measurement in the realm of print advertising analysis, leveraging forensic research methodologies. Traditional audience measurement methods often lack precision and depth in capturing the true impact of print advertisements. In response, this study employs forensic techniques to uncover nuanced insights into audience engagement and behavior. By integrating digital forensics and content analysis, we reveal hidden patterns of audience interaction with print advertisements. This paper showcases the efficacy of our approach through a case study, demonstrating how forensic research can enhance the accuracy and granularity of audience measurement in print advertising analysis. The findings emphasize the potential of this methodology to reshape the landscape of print advertising assessment and foster more informed decision-making in marketing strategies.

References

Ackoff, R. L., Shiv, G., & Minas, J. S. (1962). Scientific method: Optimizing applied research decisions. New York: John Wiley.

Baron, R. (1995). The passive people meter: An agency perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(2), 2-4.

Bradburn, N. M., & Seymor, S. (1988). Polls and surveys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Consterdine, G. (1999). How magazine advertising works. Report, Surrey, England: UK’s Periodical Publishers Association.

Danaher, P. J., & Beed, T. W. (1993). A coincidental survey of people meter panelists: Comparing what people say with what they do. Journal of Advertising Research, 33(1), 86-92.

Danaher, P. J. (1995). What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? Journal of Advertising Research, 35(1), 37-47.

Diamond, D. S. (1968). A quantitative approach to magazine advertisement format selection, Journal of Marketing Research, 5(4), 376-386.

DuBois, C. N. (1963). Time Magazine’s fingerprint’s study. Proceedings: 9th Conference, Advertising Research Foundation, New York: Advertising Research Foundation, 7-8.

Engel, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer behavior. Chicago: Dryden Press.

Green, P. E., Tull, D. S., & Albaum, G. (1988). Research for marketing decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Greene, J. D., & Maloney, J. F. (1976). Fingerprints can’t test for validity. Journal of Advertising Research, 16(3), 49-50.

Karande, K. W., & Kumar, V. (1995). The effect of brand characteristics and retailer policies on response to retail price promotions: Implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing, 71(3), 249-278.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-02

How to Cite

Niels Schmidt. (2022). UNVEILING NOVEL AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT: APPLYING FORENSIC RESEARCH FOR PRINT ADVERTISING ANALYSIS. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(09), 01–04. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/index.php/eijmr/article/view/144