HONORIFICS AND HONORIFIC CATEGORIES

Authors

  • Shukrulla Xojikulov ,Sattorova Madina Saidovna Academic Supervisor,Uzbekistan State World Languages University, 4th year student

Keywords:

Honorifics, styles, language, expressions, English, categories

Abstract

This research investigates the complex system of honorifics and honorific styles across diverse linguistic and cultural landscapes, emphasizing how language reflects and reinforces societal structures, interpersonal relationships, and worldviews. Honorifics, conventionalized forms of linguistic politeness and social deference, are universally found across languages, yet their form, usage, and underlying ideologies vary significantly. Analyzing pronoun and noun-based honorifics, as well as verbal expressions used to convey politeness, this study uncovers the intricate sociolinguistic mechanisms that govern honorific usage. By tracing the roles of honorifics as indicators of power, respect, irony, and even resistance, this study expands the conventional understanding of politeness strategies and situates honorifics at the intersection of language, culture, and identity. It argues that honorifics are not peripheral elements of grammar but essential expressions of how societies perceive and manage social relationships.

References

Yonemoto, A. (2020). A Sociolinguistic Study of the Development of Grammatical Address Systems. Journal La Sociale, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v1i1.18

Chen, X., & Lee, H. (2019). Honorifics and Politeness: Cross-Cultural Interpretations of Respect and Impoliteness. International Journal of Language and Culture, 6(2), 112–129.

Sylak-Glassman, J. (2018). Honorifics and Speaker Intentions: A Semiotic Approach. Journal of Linguistic Theory, 9(3), 211–230.

Wolfram, W., & Schilling, N. (2017). The Semiotic Complexity of Honorifics Across Cultures. Studies in Language and Society, 22(4), 298–320.

Watts, R. (2011). Linguistic Politeness and Grammar: Revisiting Honorifics. Language in Society, 40(3), 301–328.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Irvin, C. (2016). Verbal Expressions of Social Standing in Politeness Systems. Journal of Pragmatics, 94, 1–15.

Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press.

Siswandi, S., & Afifah, S. (2015). Honorific Styles in the Dampelas Language: A Cultural Perspective. Journal of Indonesian Linguistics, 13(2), 45–60.

Park, Y. (2014). Language Ideologies and Learner Identities in Korean as a Foreign Language. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 36–50.

Abdulaziz, M., & Muhammad, R. (2013). Appellative Honorifics in Contemporary Language Use. Journal of Sociolinguistics and Culture, 8(1), 88–101.

Min, H., Choi, E., & Park, S. (2012). Generic Appellative Honorifics in English and Their Cultural Equivalents. Comparative Language Studies, 10(3), 59–72.

Herlina, E., & Tarwana, W. (2018). EFL Learners’ Perspective on English Honorifics in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 14(2), 102–115.

Choksi, N. (2021). Structure, Ideology, Distribution: The Dual as Honorific in Santali. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 31(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12343

Takeuchi, H., & DiBello, K. (2017). Keigo in Japanese Language Education: Considering Linguistic Ideologies in Classrooms. Japanese Language Pedagogy Review, 11(1), 65–82.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-14

How to Cite

Shukrulla Xojikulov ,Sattorova Madina Saidovna. (2025). HONORIFICS AND HONORIFIC CATEGORIES. Ethiopian International Multidisciplinary Research Conferences, 177–181. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/conferences/index.php/eimrc/article/view/928