LINGUOCULTUROLOGICAL FEATURES OF EUPHEMISTIC SUBSTITUTIONS IN MODERN ENGLISH AND UZBEK POLITICAL COMMUNICATION.

Authors

  • Obidova Firuza Jumayevna History and Philology Department of Asia International Master’s Degree 2nd course

Keywords:

From a linguoculturological perspective, euphemisms are deeply embedded in cultural norms, values, and communicative traditions. They reflect how different societies conceptualize politeness, indirectness, and social harmony. In this regard, the comparative analysis of euphemistic usage in English and Uzbek political communication offers valuable insights into the interaction between language, culture, and ideology. While English political discourse often demonstrates a tendency toward institutionalized and globally recognizable euphemisms, Uzbek political communication reveals culturally specific patterns rooted in respect, indirect expression, and national identity.

Abstract

In modern political communication, language functions not only as a means of conveying information but also as a powerful instrument of shaping public perception and ideological influence. Among various linguistic devices, euphemisms occupy a central place due to their ability to mitigate, obscure, or strategically reframe sensitive or controversial issues. Euphemistic substitutions allow political actors to present reality in a more acceptable or favorable way, thereby influencing how audiences interpret political messages.

References

Orwell G. Politics and the English Language // Horizon. — 1946. — Vol. 13, No. 76. — P. 252–265.

Allan K., Burridge K. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. — New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. — 263 p.

Lakoff G. Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. — White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004. — 144 p.

Van Dijk T. A. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. — London: Sage Publications, 1998. — 365 p.

Hojiyeva M. O‘zbek tilida yevfemizm va disfemizm hodisalari. — Toshkent: Fan, 2018. — 180 b.

Fairclough N. Language and Power. — London: Longman, 1989. — 259 p.

Herman E. S., Chomsky N. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. — New York: Pantheon Books, 1988. — 412 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Obidova Firuza Jumayevna. (2026). LINGUOCULTUROLOGICAL FEATURES OF EUPHEMISTIC SUBSTITUTIONS IN MODERN ENGLISH AND UZBEK POLITICAL COMMUNICATION. Ethiopian International Multidisciplinary Research Conferences, 3(1), 171–174. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/conferences/index.php/eimrc/article/view/2112

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Ethiopian International Multidisciplinary Research Conferences

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.