THE EFFECT OF GAMIFIED CALL ACTIVITIES ON VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN B1 LEVEL EFL LEARNERS

Authors

  • Madina Qurbonaliyeva Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Keywords:

CALL, vocabulary acquisition, gamification, task-based language teaching, EFL, B1 level, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This study looks at how gamified CALL (Computer-Assisted Language Learning) activities affect vocabulary learning in B1 level English classes. The research was carried out in a public secondary school in Uzbekistan with 32 students. One group of 15 students used digital quiz platforms (Quizizz and Kahoot) in their lessons, while another group of 17 students followed the regular textbook-based approach. After six weeks, the digital group improved their vocabulary scores by 28 percentage points, compared to only 12 points for the traditional group. Students also reported feeling more motivated and engaged during the digital lessons. The findings show that using gamified CALL tools within a task-based teaching approach can make vocabulary learning more effective and more enjoyable for B1 learners. The paper also suggests practical steps for teachers and educational policymakers in Uzbekistan.

References

Bicen, H., & Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/328635

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification." In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/329289

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Stockwell, G. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury.

Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/329394

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970

Zhao, F. (2019). Using Quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p37

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

Madina Qurbonaliyeva. (2026). THE EFFECT OF GAMIFIED CALL ACTIVITIES ON VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN B1 LEVEL EFL LEARNERS. Ethiopian International Multidisciplinary Research Conferences, 2(2), 228–234. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/conferences/index.php/eimrc/article/view/2066