INTEGRATION OF INTENSIVE CARE AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN CHOLANGIOSEPSIS: IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Boynazarov Subkhonbek Sherzod ugli, Yuldoshev Inoyat Bahodir ugli, Shaymanov Omar Ortiq ugli,Sadullaev Muhammad Musurmon ugli residents, Samarkand State Medical University,Assistant of the Department of Surgery, Endoscopy, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Samarkand State Medical University

Keywords:

cholangiosepsis; intensive care; surgical management; multidisciplinary approach; biliary decompression; clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Cholangiosepsis is a severe form of biliary tract infection associated with high morbidity and mortality despite advances in surgical techniques and intensive care medicine. Effective management of this condition requires not only timely surgical source control but also close integration with intensive care support. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of coordinated intensive care and surgical management on clinical outcomes in patients with cholangiosepsis. Clinical data from patients treated in a specialized hepatobiliary center were analyzed with particular attention to hemodynamic stabilization, timing of biliary decompression, and multidisciplinary decision-making. The results demonstrate that integrated intensive care and surgical management leads to improved hemodynamic stability, reduced incidence of septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction, lower postoperative complication rates, and decreased mortality. Furthermore, coordinated care was associated with shorter intensive care unit stay and overall hospitalization duration. These findings highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary collaboration in optimizing treatment strategies and improving outcomes in patients with cholangiosepsis.

References

Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management of acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):17–30.

Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before antimicrobial therapy and survival in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–1596.

Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–377.

Sadullayev, M. M., & Sh, N. A. (2024). PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF EXTERNAL RESPIRATION IN WOMEN WITH PNEUMONIA DURING ABDOMINAL DELIVERY. Progress of Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 122-130.

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810.

Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA score to describe organ dysfunction. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–710.

Садуллаев, М. М., Абдурахимов, У. А., & Жумакулов, А. С. (2024). ВЛИЯНИЕ МЕТОДОВ АНЕСТЕЗИИ НА ГЕМОДИНАМИКУ И ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКОЕ КРОВООБРАЩЕНИЕ У БЕРЕМЕННЫХ ПРИ ПЛАНОВЫХ АБДОМИНАЛЬНЫХ ОПЕРАЦИЯХ. Progress of Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 530-536.

Садуллаев, М. М., Эшмирзаев, Б. М., & Эломонов, Д. К. (2024). РЕАНИМАЦИЯ: ТЕОРИЯ, ПРАКТИКА И СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ. Progress of Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 140-148.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Boynazarov Subkhonbek Sherzod ugli, Yuldoshev Inoyat Bahodir ugli, Shaymanov Omar Ortiq ugli,Sadullaev Muhammad Musurmon ugli. (2026). INTEGRATION OF INTENSIVE CARE AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN CHOLANGIOSEPSIS: IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES. Ethiopian International Multidisciplinary Research Conferences, 1(2), 365–367. Retrieved from https://eijmr.org/conferences/index.php/eimrc/article/view/1879